Concerns about the potential harm caused by gambling advertisements to youngsters and other vulnerable demographics continue in Australia. Meanwhile, some legislators have proposed that gambling advertisements should also be banned on social media and podcasts.
Australia is currently facing intense debates about gambling marketing as the government considers new rules due to growing public worries. The discussions focus on the ethics and effects of gambling ads, especially on young people, as the industry continues to expand on a global scale.
Independent MPs Rebekha Sharkie and Andrew Wilkie have asked Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Opposition Leader Peter Dutton to permit a conscience vote on the proposed gambling advertising laws. Their request highlights significant disagreements within Parliament and echoes the community’s increasing concern about the normalization of gambling.
The debate over gambling advertising has evolved from a simple regulatory issue into one deeply connected to personal beliefs and societal values. Wilkie noted that some backbenchers are deeply uncomfortable with the government’s hesitation to enforce stricter limits. The government proposes limiting gambling ads to two per hour during regular TV programming.
The Australian Institute of Family Studies recently studied this topic and revealed some eye-opening observations. This study found a strong connection between seeing betting ads and engaging in riskier gambling behavior.
According to the report, the widespread presence of these ads in Australia has led to significant public support for government action, including potential bans. It reveals that 78% of Australian adults have seen or heard race or sports betting advertisements at least once a week over the past year. About 41% of adults are exposed to these ads four or more times weekly.
This research shows the community’s desire for strong measures against wagering advertising and their expectation of government leadership. It also underlines the pressing need for change, as there is considerable support for completely banning these ads. This widespread support reflects a growing recognition in Australian society that gambling is a major source of harm that needs to be addressed.
The AIFS report found that 64% of Australians believe the government should have the most significant role in regulating how and when the media advertises betting. About 53% support a complete ban on wagering ads across all platforms before 10:30 p.m., and 47% support a ban on all social media platforms.
The report also revealed that exposure to wagering ads had the most substantial impact on young people aged between 18 and 34 and those at risk of gambling harm. It notes that 19% of young women and 15% of young men placed their first bet after viewing or hearing an advertisement on TV. For those at risk of gambling harm, 41% acknowledged trying a new form of betting after certain promotions, while 40% admitted to betting impulsively after interacting with these ads.
The report also reflects the concerns of the Australian public, with many believing that wagering ads make gambling seem normal. A huge portion of the population feels that sports and race betting are too common. About 69% agree with this view, and 60% think it makes sports less family-friendly.
The latest recommendations have led the government to consider a partial ban or a limit on gambling ads, disappointing activists pushing for more decisive actions. The Australian Medical Association (AMA) has expressed its support for a total ban on online gambling ads. Reaffirming its previous position, the association urged the government to enforce a complete ban within three years. In an official statement on its website, the AMA stated that banning ads promoting online gambling products would align with the unanimous recommendations from the recent parliamentary inquiry report dubbed “You win some, you lose more.”
Steve Robson, the AMA President Professor, expressed strong disappointment over the government’s softer stance on gambling ads. He firmly believes that anything short of a complete ban on online gambling advertising will fail to protect Australians from falling into gambling addiction. Robson also warned that if betting companies are given any leeway with ads, they will take advantage of it. He related the situation to what happened with the vaping industry. Robson pointed out that the same patterns are now emerging in the gambling industry.
In a previous interview with ABC Radio, Robson stressed that vulnerable individuals needed protection from the overwhelming gambling ads. He explained that advertising during sports events is particularly harmful because it connects online gambling with activities that should be positive and healthy. The AMA also highlighted that Australians lose around AUD 25 billion annually on gambling. This figure places the country at the top for gambling losses per person.
Crossbench MPs are urging the government to expand its proposed ban on gambling ads on social media to include podcasts. This happens as Labor continues to review its revised reform plans. The government has yet to address the issue of gambling ad revenue from audio platforms like Spotify. Recent discussions with media companies and gambling reform advocates did not cover this topic.
During a briefing with crossbench members, Labor did not outline how its gambling ad reform package would address audio streaming services. Those familiar with the meeting noted that this issue needed to be specified.
For instance, independent MP Andrew Wilkie strongly believes that any ban or restrictions proposed by the government should apply to all media, including podcasts. His counterpart, Allegra Spender, argued that partial bans are ineffective and called on the major parties to allow a free vote on the legislation. She made this plea in light of some dissatisfaction among Labor’s backbenchers.
The proposed ban aims to restrict gambling ads online, in live broadcasts, and during children’s programs. This plan recommends only two ads per hour during general programming, and on-field signs and logos on jerseys would still be permitted. The 2023 parliamentary committee, led by the late Labor MP Peta Murphy, had suggested a complete ban.
Monash University’s School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine’s Associate Professor Charles Livingstone argues that partial bans are ineffective. He cites tobacco companies as an example. These brands kept advertising on players’ uniforms and at sports venues even after the broadcast ads ban. Government Minister Bill Shorten argued that gambling is different from tobacco. However, experts have consistently highlighted the health risks of gambling and likened the sector’s maneuvers to those used by the tobacco sector.
CQ University Experimental Gambling Research Laboratory Associate Professor Alex Russell agreed that a partial ban is unlikely to be very effective. He noted that while TV ads are a major and visible part of gambling advertising, there are also online and targeted ads such as emails and text messages. Based on how the researchers see it, reducing TV ads alone might help a bit, but it won’t make a significant difference.
Slots
Poker
Blackjack
Video Poker
Baccarat
Roulette
